Auszeichnung
künstlerischer Projekträume
und -initiativen
Auszeichnung
künstlerischer Projekträume
und -initiativen
Archiv
:
2023
,
2022
,
2021
,
2020
,
2019
,
2018
,
2017
,
2016
,
2015
,
2014
,
2013
,
2012
Events
Archiv
Information
Stipendien 2021
Stipendien 2022
Statements
Rückblick
Kontakt
Impressum
2019
,
mp43
projektraum für das periphere
2019
,
2012
Stollberger Straße
73
Berlin
12627
mp43-culturebase.org
Eingang des Projektraums, Foto: Carola Rümper
It always feels quite special when an institution catches the zeitgeist of a moment. Project spaces have a lot more freedom in this sense, and they can truly, sincerely, reflect a moment or a movement as it is happening. They are essential to a critically active arts scene. Perhaps the orientation of project spaces has been forced to shift towards something more self-sustainable – but that might not be a bad thing.
The word “project space” is almost misleading to me. Projects do not have to take place in spaces. Radio shows, Instagram takeovers, and outdoor screenings are also projects. To focus on the aspect of space itself is to take a narrow view of what could – and is – happening in Berlin at the moment. The ideal project space would come with a budget for production and overhead costs. Ideally, also the curators ought to get paid.
Funding and access to funding is a key element in sustaining project spaces. There are many funding tools that project spaces can use to cover the costs of labor, materials, and rent. But the options are competitive and usually involve a lot of effort and paperwork. In our opinion, there needs to be a change in the funding system that includes simplifying the application process and shortening the waiting time between submission and announcement of the result. Only like this can the project space keep the momentum and focus on artistic and curatorial projects.